Module assessment

To detect suspicious user behavior and generate alerts.

To understand what data was involved, how it was used, and what risk it presents.

To replace audit logs and provide a complete record of user actions.

Because alerts and logs are unreliable in modern environments.

Because alerts often show activity without confirming whether sensitive data was involved.

Because investigations must always start with data instead of activity.

Alerting systems that surface unusual or risky activity.

Incident response workflows for containment and remediation.

Audit logs that provide records of user and system activity.

Reactive investigations focus on known activity, while proactive investigations assess potential risk before an incident occurs.

Reactive investigations are automated, while proactive investigations require manual review.

Proactive investigations are only used after a security incident is confirmed.

When alerts confirm activity but don't provide enough information to assess data sensitivity or exposure.

When a quick response is required and the risk is already clear.

When every alert needs to be fully investigated to avoid missing risk.